3D Printing Machine Training
Published

Rutgers Engineers Create Faster, More Precise 3D Printing Process

Researchers says their Multiplexed Fused Filament Fabrication Process could be a game changer for the 3D printing industry.

Share

By programming a prototype to move in efficient patterns and by using a series of small nozzles to deposit molten material, researchers say they were able to increase printing resolution and size as well as significantly decrease printing time. Photo Credit: Rutgers School of Engineering

By programming a prototype to move in efficient patterns and by using a series of small nozzles to deposit molten material, researchers say they were able to increase printing resolution and size as well as significantly decrease printing time. Photo Credit: Rutgers School of Engineering

Rutgers engineers says they have created a way to 3D print large, complex parts at a fraction of the cost of current methods.

“We have more tests to run to understand the strength and geometric potential of the parts we can make, but as long as those elements are there, we believe this could be a game changer for the industry,” says Jeremy Cleeman, a graduate student researcher at the Rutgers School of Engineering and the lead author of the study.

The approach is called Multiplexed Fused Filament Fabrication (MF3), which uses a single gantry (the sliding structure on a 3D printer) to print individual or multiple parts simultaneously. By programming a prototype to move in efficient patterns and by using a series of small nozzles rather than a single large nozzle, as is common in conventional printing to deposit molten material, the researchers say they were able to increase printing resolution and size as well as significantly decrease printing time.

“MF3 will change how thermoplastic printing is done,” Cleeman says.

According to the researchers, the 3D-printing industry has struggled with what is known as the throughput resolution tradeoff the speed at which 3D printers deposit material versus the resolution of the finished product. It is said larger diameter nozzles are faster than smaller ones but may generate more ridges and contours that must be smoothed out later, adding significant postproduction costs.

By contrast, smaller nozzles deposit material with greater resolution, but researchers say current methods with conventional software are too slow to be cost effective.

At the heart of MF3’s innovation is its software. To program a 3D printer, engineers use a software tool called a slicer computer code that maps an object into the virtual “slices” or layers that will be printed. Rutgers researchers wrote slicer software they say optimized the gantry arm’s movement and determined when the nozzles should be turned on and off to achieve the highest efficiency. MF3’s toolpath strategy makes it possible to “concurrently print multiple, geometrically distinct, noncontiguous parts of varying sizes” using a single printer, the researchers wrote in their study.

Cleeman said he sees numerous benefits to this technology. For one, the hardware used in MF3 can be purchased off the shelf and doesn’t need to be customized, making potential adoption easier.

Additionally, because the nozzles can be turned on and off independently, an MF3 printer has built-in resiliency, making it less prone to costly downtime, Cleeman adds. For instance, when a nozzle fails in a conventional printer, the printing process must be halted. In MF3 printing, the work of a malfunctioning nozzle can be assumed by another nozzle on the same arm.

As 3D printing increases in popularity — for manufacturing and particularly for the prototyping of new products — resolving the throughput resolution trade-off is essential, Cleeman says, adding that MF3 is a major contribution to this effort.

UPM Additive Solutions
The World According To
Acquire
Airtech
The Cool Parts Show
AM Radio

Related Content

Metal

Carnegie Mellon Helps Industry, Students Prepare for a Manufacturing Future with AM and AI

Work underway at the university’s Next Manufacturing Center and Manufacturing Futures Institute is helping industrial additive manufacturers achieve success today, while applying artificial intelligence, surrogate modeling and more to solve the problems of the future.

Read More
Design

3D Printed Cutting Tool for Large Transmission Part: The Cool Parts Show Bonus

A boring tool that was once 30 kg challenged the performance of the machining center using it. The replacement tool is 11.5 kg, and more efficient as well, thanks to generative design.

Read More

Overcoming the Bottleneck to Customized Manufacturing: Quoting

Spokbee’s software-as-a-service platform is shaving months off of the quoting and pricing process for 3D printed and other types of configurable products.

Read More
Software

User-Friendly Mass Spectrometry Tool to Enable AM

The Massbox is a technology designed to simplify mass spectrometry by bypassing the need to send samples to the lab for characterization and testing purposes. Exum Instruments’ debut tool is suitable for AM as it can assist with quality assurance, material characterization and failure analysis.

Read More

Read Next

Postprocessing

Postprocessing Steps and Costs for Metal 3D Printing

When your metal part is done 3D printing, you just pull it out of the machine and start using it, right? Not exactly. 

Read More
Product Development

How Avid Product Development Creates Efficiencies in High-Mix, Low-Volume Additive Manufacturing

Contract manufacturer Avid Product Development (a Lubrizol company) has developed strategies to streamline part production through 3D printing so its engineering team can focus on development, design, assembly and other services. 

Read More
Design

3MF File Format for Additive Manufacturing: More Than Geometry

The file format offers a less data-intensive way of recording part geometry, as well as details about build preparation, material, process and more.

Read More
3D printing machine trainings