3D Printing Helps Prove Sensor Marketability in Low Volume
Before going into full-scale production for a water sensor system, Sensocare used 3D-printed master molds and parts to produce an initial run.
Fish farming requires farmers to closely monitor water conditions to control rearing operations and yield an ideal harvesting rate. Sensors are increasingly being used to help farmers automatically detect factors such as water acidity level and plankton blooms, and manage their operations accordingly. Sensocare, the manufacturer of the Aquafarm Water Sensor System, recently used 3D printing for time and cost savings in bringing this solution to market.
Based in Singapore, Sensocore is a subsidiary under CamTech Diagnostics, a company that regularly uses 3D printing to produce master molds for silicone molding. The company originally used a consumer-grade 3D printer for this application, but this printer had limitations in accuracy and surface finish that made it necessary to spend hours sanding and touching up the prints, often at risk of damage to the parts during postprocessing. Additionally, certain features such as thin walls could not be replicated accurately.
To create thin-walled masters with smooth surface finish resembling end-use parts, CamTech purchased a Stratasys Eden 260VS industry-grade 3D printer from Creatz3D. This printer uses PolyJet technology, which works similar to an inkjet printer by depositing droplets of photocurable liquid material onto a build tray in layers as fine as 16 microns. The material is simultaneously cured as it is deposited via UV light.
Being able to 3D print master tooling for silicone molding saved the company time in manufacturing parts, reducing lead time from 2 to 3 weeks down to 36 hours. Costs were also reduced by more than 90 percent.
Following initial sales of the water sensor system and feedback from customers, Sensocore realized that the function button panel might malfunction from being exposed to the elements. The company designed a sleeve protector that would wrap around the system, ensuring a snug fit and keeping out the water. The sleeve itself was 3D-printed from urethane rubber and silicone materials selected for their rigid, flexible, durable, and high-temperature resistant properties. It took just 4 days to produce the 3D-printed sleeve, a time savings of 86 percent and cost savings of 95 percent over traditional manufacturing. Any future variations in the part can be easily customized with CAD with little to no cost.
Sensocore says that 3D printing enabled it to prove the marketability of the product in low volume, with a plan to pursue mass production using traditional manufacturing methods when orders increase.
Related Content
-
3D Printing with Plastic Pellets – What You Need to Know
A few 3D printers today are capable of working directly with resin pellets for feedstock. That brings extreme flexibility in material options, but also requires greater knowledge of how to best process any given resin. Here’s how FGF machine maker JuggerBot 3D addresses both the printing technology and the process know-how.
-
Beehive Industries Is Going Big on Small-Scale Engines Made Through Additive Manufacturing
Backed by decades of experience in both aviation and additive, the company is now laser-focused on a single goal: developing, proving and scaling production of engines providing 5,000 lbs of thrust or less.
-
How Norsk Titanium Is Scaling Up AM Production — and Employment — in New York State
New opportunities for part production via the company’s forging-like additive process are coming from the aerospace industry as well as a different sector, the semiconductor industry.