Solving MRO Challenges with Bound Metal Deposition

Desktop Metal’s Studio System bound metal deposition (BMD) printer has shown great success in achieving cost and efficiency savings for manufacturers looking to produce maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) parts in-house, while also removing many of the obstacles traditionally holding back metal additive manufacturing (AM). BMD is an adaptation of metal injection molding (MIM), with the second-generation Studio System extruding a feedstock rod made of pre-mixed metal powder and polymer binder into a “green” part that is then placed into a sintering furnace to remove the binder and give the part its finished properties. This process removes the need for consumable solvent debinder, and eliminates both dangerous loose powders and powerful lasers — bypassing many of the environmental and safety concerns found with other metal AM printing methods. Ethan Rejto, technical marketing manager of Desktop Metal, goes so far as to describe the Studio System as “the world’s first office-friendly metal 3D printing system,” saying it can operate just across the room from his desk.

Desktop Metal recommends the Studio System for low-volume applications like functional prototyping and parts like jigs, fixturing and other tooling, as well as replacement components. The variety of compatible materials includes 17-4PH stainless steel, 316L stainless steel, H13 tool steel, pure copper and 4140 low-alloy steel. Separable supports make the system easy to use, and users can also batch parts together in a single furnace, enhancing operational efficiency.

In a webinar Rejto conducted with our sister publication Modern Machine Shop in March of this year, he gave examples of the improvements clients saw in MRO parts printed through the Studio System.

Stronger Spring Holder Hanger

Preziosa Francesco S.r.l. used the Studio System to make notable innovations upon a spring holder hanger. This piece was part of a paneling machine, coupling with a gear through a spring to enable the machine’s arm to rotate pieces of sheet metal. With traditional methods, the shop took seven days to receive the part — longer, if its supplier was out of stock. It also cost €60 per part, and the design suffered from frequent tearout issues. Preziosa Francesco S.r.l. reverse-engineered the part and optimized its geometry within Desktop Metal’s software architecture. When produced through AM on the Studio System, this modified part had a 1-hour-and-40-minute production time, cost only €15 per part, had less material waste and demonstrated increased strength.

Dramatic Cost Reduction for Multiple Parts

Eaton Corporation’s Vehicle Group used the Studio System to produce replacement furnace chain guides — furnace loading and unloading conveyor components that the firm’s external vendors machined and heat treated. After using a 3D scanner to build the model and printing it with the Studio System, Eaton realized 82% cost savings and an extended part life. The system also enabled the firm to realize significant benefits for testing fixtures and gripping components, particularly in the case of a test stand oil fill nozzle. Because AM is able to create complex internal geometries and features at a reduction in cost — as opposed to the increase in expense with standard machining — this part saw even more significant cost savings compared to purchasing from an external vendor using traditional manufacturing: the statistics Rejto provided report cost savings between 94% and 96%.

Near-Net Molds in Under a Week

Innovative Plastics Inc. used the Studio System to change the production method for its molds. Traditionally, the company has used CNC mills and EDM — but even the simplest mold made this way requires lead time between four and six weeks. Performing AM through the Studio System enabled the company to print near-net-shape mold tooling in a fraction of the time, while also adding conformal cooling channels. Without postprocessing (which these 3D printed molds still require), time to part is about 5.75 days. The mold for one part, an exhaust cover cap for a boat motor, traditionally cost between $10,000 and $12,000, with a molding cycle time between 23 and 25 seconds. The AM part reduced costs to between $6,000 and $8,000, with a shortened cycle time of 20 seconds due to conformal cooling. This enabled Innovative Plastics to not only cut costs, but also increase production and revenue.