Sigma Additive Solutions Creates Software Module for Standardizing Machine Health Data Logs
This next-generation open architecture offering can streamline processes, advance digital quality workflows and enable additive industry users to gain consistency across their sites and supply chains.
Sigma Additive Solutions (Sigma) has developed a software module for standardizing machine health data logs. This next-generation open architecture offering can streamline processes, advance digital quality workflows and enable additive industry users to gain consistency across their sites and supply chains
The company, a developer of quality assurance software for the commercial 3D printing industry, is releasing a beta version of its PrintRite3D Machine Health module. This solution marks the beginning of the company’s software-only approach to quality assurance by enabling users to take disparate machine log files and standardize them. Built upon Sigma’s PrintRite3D monitoring and analytics technology, the company is creating a framework for connecting and standardizing distinct sensors and images into a cohesive product suite.
Features of the new solution include a path to scale for integrated sensor fusion of camera, thermal camera, melt pool data and more; ability to link machines by API or upload all machine sensor .csv log files; and creation of a common standards-based file format for analytics, visualization, and reporting, agnostic of machine type.
It also includes a single cohesive environment for all in-process quality data, customizable to unique production requirements; deep insight, analytics and reporting of machine sensor data; and dashboard visualization showing key metrics.
“This is an exciting announcement, not only for Sigma, but for the entire additive industry,” says Jacob Brunsberg, Sigma’s president and CEO. “Today, proprietary quality control approaches of various additive machine manufacturers often lead to inconsistency in quality assurance across manufacturing operations. The objective of the initial module — and all future modules — is to help drive a standards-based approach to additive manufacturing, allowing users to gain consistency across their sites and supply chains. Allowing users to take disparate machine log files and standardize them is an important first step in connecting distinct sensors and images into a cohesive product suite.”
Users say a truly holistic approach to quality is just what the industry needs. “As a member of the Sigma Additive Product Advisory Council, I am thrilled to have early access to the launch of the Machine Health and future modules, and to put them to work in our facility,” says Ivan Madera, Morf3D CEO. “Standardizing machine logs will streamline processes and advance digital quality workflows. Having a single interface, streaming data from all connected machines, moves the industry forward into a digital future and away from hours of work from manually collecting, converting, processing and analyzing all the individual aspects of quality.”
The company says sensor fusion — conjoining data types — will provide improved confidence in defect detection, root cause analysis and mitigation, enabling everyone to interpret control charts and other data types/sources uniformly. “Our engineering team has spent over 10 years developing the technology to provide a framework for standards-based data exchange, metrics and analytics,” says Darren Beckett, Sigma CTO. “We are committed to an open architecture philosophy and acting as a third-party agnostic option, connectable to the broader installed base of the additive industry.”
-
Read about Sigma’s partnership with Materialise that combines the Materialise Control Platform (MCP) and Sigma Labs’ PrintRite3D sensor technology to enable users to identify and correct metal build issues in real-time.
- Learn how Sigma launched an engineering collaboration with Additive Industries to provide in-process melt-pool monitoring on a four full-field laser system.
Related Content
Implicit Modeling for Additive Manufacturing
Some software tools now use this modeling strategy as opposed to explicit methods of representing geometry. Here’s how it works, and why it matters for additive manufacturing.
Read More3MF File Format for Additive Manufacturing: More Than Geometry
The file format offers a less data-intensive way of recording part geometry, as well as details about build preparation, material, process and more.
Read MoreDecentralized Manufacturing Network Aims to Make 3D Printers a Shared Global Resource
The 3DOS additive manufacturing network will let OEMs and creators take advantage of open 3D printer capacity anywhere in the world.
Read MoreOvercoming the Bottleneck to Customized Manufacturing: Quoting
Spokbee’s software-as-a-service platform is shaving months off of the quoting and pricing process for 3D printed and other types of configurable products.
Read MoreRead Next
Postprocessing Steps and Costs for Metal 3D Printing
When your metal part is done 3D printing, you just pull it out of the machine and start using it, right? Not exactly.
Read MoreProfilometry-Based Indentation Plastometry (PIP) as an Alternative to Standard Tensile Testing
UK-based Plastometrex offers a benchtop testing device utilizing PIP to quickly and easily analyze the yield strength, tensile strength and uniform elongation of samples and even printed parts. The solution is particularly useful for additive manufacturing.
Read MoreAlquist 3D Looks Toward a Carbon-Sequestering Future with 3D Printed Infrastructure
The Colorado startup aims to reduce the carbon footprint of new buildings, homes and city infrastructure with robotic 3D printing and a specialized geopolymer material.
Read More